# Source: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/build-with-claude/prompt-engineering/claude-4-best-practices.md

# Prompting best practices

---

This guide provides specific prompt engineering techniques for Claude 4.x models, with specific guidance for Sonnet 4.5, Haiku 4.5, and Opus 4.5. These models have been trained for more precise instruction following than previous generations of Claude models.
<Tip>
  For an overview of Claude 4.5's new capabilities, see [What's new in Claude 4.5](/docs/en/about-claude/models/whats-new-claude-4-5). For migration guidance from previous models, see [Migrating to Claude 4.5](/docs/en/about-claude/models/migrating-to-claude-4).
</Tip>

## General principles

### Be explicit with your instructions

Claude 4.x models respond well to clear, explicit instructions. Being specific about your desired output can help enhance results. Customers who desire the "above and beyond" behavior from previous Claude models might need to more explicitly request these behaviors with newer models.

<section title="Example: Creating an analytics dashboard">

**Less effective:**
```text
Create an analytics dashboard
```

**More effective:**
```text
Create an analytics dashboard. Include as many relevant features and interactions as possible. Go beyond the basics to create a fully-featured implementation.
```

</section>

### Add context to improve performance

Providing context or motivation behind your instructions, such as explaining to Claude why such behavior is important, can help Claude 4.x models better understand your goals and deliver more targeted responses.

<section title="Example: Formatting preferences">

**Less effective:**
```text
NEVER use ellipses
```

**More effective:**
```text
Your response will be read aloud by a text-to-speech engine, so never use ellipses since the text-to-speech engine will not know how to pronounce them.
```

</section>

Claude is smart enough to generalize from the explanation.

### Be vigilant with examples & details

Claude 4.x models pay close attention to details and examples as part of their precise instruction following capabilities. Ensure that your examples align with the behaviors you want to encourage and minimize behaviors you want to avoid.

### Long-horizon reasoning and state tracking

Claude 4.5 models excel at long-horizon reasoning tasks with exceptional state tracking capabilities. It maintains orientation across extended sessions by focusing on incremental progress—making steady advances on a few things at a time rather than attempting everything at once. This capability especially emerges over multiple context windows or task iterations, where Claude can work on a complex task, save the state, and continue with a fresh context window.

#### Context awareness and multi-window workflows

Claude 4.5 models feature [context awareness](/docs/en/build-with-claude/context-windows#context-awareness-in-claude-sonnet-4-5), enabling the model to track its remaining context window (i.e. "token budget") throughout a conversation. This enables Claude to execute tasks and manage context more effectively by understanding how much space it has to work.

**Managing context limits:**

If you are using Claude in an agent harness that compacts context or allows saving context to external files (like in Claude Code), we suggest adding this information to your prompt so Claude can behave accordingly. Otherwise, Claude may sometimes naturally try to wrap up work as it approaches the context limit. Below is an example prompt:

```text Sample prompt
Your context window will be automatically compacted as it approaches its limit, allowing you to continue working indefinitely from where you left off. Therefore, do not stop tasks early due to token budget concerns. As you approach your token budget limit, save your current progress and state to memory before the context window refreshes. Always be as persistent and autonomous as possible and complete tasks fully, even if the end of your budget is approaching. Never artificially stop any task early regardless of the context remaining.
```

The [memory tool](/docs/en/agents-and-tools/tool-use/memory-tool) pairs naturally with context awareness for seamless context transitions.

#### Multi-context window workflows

For tasks spanning multiple context windows:

1. **Use a different prompt for the very first context window**: Use the first context window to set up a framework (write tests, create setup scripts), then use future context windows to iterate on a todo-list.

2. **Have the model write tests in a structured format**: Ask Claude to create tests before starting work and keep track of them in a structured format (e.g., `tests.json`). This leads to better long-term ability to iterate. Remind Claude of the importance of tests: "It is unacceptable to remove or edit tests because this could lead to missing or buggy functionality."

3. **Set up quality of life tools**: Encourage Claude to create setup scripts (e.g., `init.sh`) to gracefully start servers, run test suites, and linters. This prevents repeated work when continuing from a fresh context window.

4. **Starting fresh vs compacting**: When a context window is cleared, consider starting with a brand new context window rather than using compaction. Claude 4.5 models are extremely effective at discovering state from the local filesystem. In some cases, you may want to take advantage of this over compaction. Be prescriptive about how it should start:
   - "Call pwd; you can only read and write files in this directory."
   - "Review progress.txt, tests.json, and the git logs."
   - "Manually run through a fundamental integration test before moving on to implementing new features."

5. **Provide verification tools**: As the length of autonomous tasks grows, Claude needs to verify correctness without continuous human feedback. Tools like Playwright MCP server or computer use capabilities for testing UIs are helpful.

6. **Encourage complete usage of context**: Prompt Claude to efficiently complete components before moving on:

```text Sample prompt
This is a very long task, so it may be beneficial to plan out your work clearly. It's encouraged to spend your entire output context working on the task - just make sure you don't run out of context with significant uncommitted work. Continue working systematically until you have completed this task.
```

#### State management best practices

- **Use structured formats for state data**: When tracking structured information (like test results or task status), use JSON or other structured formats to help Claude understand schema requirements
- **Use unstructured text for progress notes**: Freeform progress notes work well for tracking general progress and context
- **Use git for state tracking**: Git provides a log of what's been done and checkpoints that can be restored. Claude 4.5 models perform especially well in using git to track state across multiple sessions.
- **Emphasize incremental progress**: Explicitly ask Claude to keep track of its progress and focus on incremental work

<section title="Example: State tracking">

```json
// Structured state file (tests.json)
{
  "tests": [
    {"id": 1, "name": "authentication_flow", "status": "passing"},
    {"id": 2, "name": "user_management", "status": "failing"},
    {"id": 3, "name": "api_endpoints", "status": "not_started"}
  ],
  "total": 200,
  "passing": 150,
  "failing": 25,
  "not_started": 25
}
```

```text
// Progress notes (progress.txt)
Session 3 progress:
- Fixed authentication token validation
- Updated user model to handle edge cases
- Next: investigate user_management test failures (test #2)
- Note: Do not remove tests as this could lead to missing functionality
```

</section>

### Communication style

Claude 4.5 models have a more concise and natural communication style compared to previous models:

- **More direct and grounded**: Provides fact-based progress reports rather than self-celebratory updates
- **More conversational**: Slightly more fluent and colloquial, less machine-like
- **Less verbose**: May skip detailed summaries for efficiency unless prompted otherwise

This communication style accurately reflects what has been accomplished without unnecessary elaboration.

## Guidance for specific situations

### Balance verbosity

Claude 4.5 models tend toward efficiency and may skip verbal summaries after tool calls, jumping directly to the next action. While this creates a streamlined workflow, you may prefer more visibility into its reasoning process.

If you want Claude to provide updates as it works:

```text Sample prompt
After completing a task that involves tool use, provide a quick summary of the work you've done.
```

### Tool usage patterns

Claude 4.5 models are trained for precise instruction following and benefits from explicit direction to use specific tools. If you say "can you suggest some changes," it will sometimes provide suggestions rather than implementing them—even if making changes might be what you intended.

For Claude to take action, be more explicit:

<section title="Example: Explicit instructions">

**Less effective (Claude will only suggest):**
```text
Can you suggest some changes to improve this function?
```

**More effective (Claude will make the changes):**
```text
Change this function to improve its performance.
```

Or:
```text
Make these edits to the authentication flow.
```

</section>

To make Claude more proactive about taking action by default, you can add this to your system prompt:

```text Sample prompt for proactive action
<default_to_action>
By default, implement changes rather than only suggesting them. If the user's intent is unclear, infer the most useful likely action and proceed, using tools to discover any missing details instead of guessing. Try to infer the user's intent about whether a tool call (e.g., file edit or read) is intended or not, and act accordingly.
</default_to_action>
```

On the other hand, if you want the model to be more hesitant by default, less prone to jumping straight into implementations, and only take action if requested, you can steer this behavior with a prompt like the below:

```text Sample prompt for conservative action
<do_not_act_before_instructions>
Do not jump into implementatation or changes files unless clearly instructed to make changes. When the user's intent is ambiguous, default to providing information, doing research, and providing recommendations rather than taking action. Only proceed with edits, modifications, or implementations when the user explicitly requests them.
</do_not_act_before_instructions>
```

### Tool usage and triggering

Claude Opus 4.5 is more responsive to the system prompt than previous models. If your prompts were designed to reduce undertriggering on tools or skills, Claude Opus 4.5 may now overtrigger. The fix is to dial back any aggressive language. Where you might have said "CRITICAL: You MUST use this tool when...", you can use more normal prompting like "Use this tool when...".

### Control the format of responses

There are a few ways that we have found to be particularly effective in steering output formatting in Claude 4.x models:

1. **Tell Claude what to do instead of what not to do**

   - Instead of: "Do not use markdown in your response"
   - Try: "Your response should be composed of smoothly flowing prose paragraphs."

2. **Use XML format indicators**

   - Try: "Write the prose sections of your response in \<smoothly_flowing_prose_paragraphs\> tags."

3. **Match your prompt style to the desired output**

   The formatting style used in your prompt may influence Claude's response style. If you are still experiencing steerability issues with output formatting, we recommend as best as you can matching your prompt style to your desired output style. For example, removing markdown from your prompt can reduce the volume of markdown in the output.

4. **Use detailed prompts for specific formatting preferences**

   For more control over markdown and formatting usage, provide explicit guidance:

```text Sample prompt to minimize markdown
<avoid_excessive_markdown_and_bullet_points>
When writing reports, documents, technical explanations, analyses, or any long-form content, write in clear, flowing prose using complete paragraphs and sentences. Use standard paragraph breaks for organization and reserve markdown primarily for `inline code`, code blocks (```...```), and simple headings (###, and ###). Avoid using **bold** and *italics*.

DO NOT use ordered lists (1. ...) or unordered lists (*) unless : a) you're presenting truly discrete items where a list format is the best option, or b) the user explicitly requests a list or ranking

Instead of listing items with bullets or numbers, incorporate them naturally into sentences. This guidance applies especially to technical writing. Using prose instead of excessive formatting will improve user satisfaction. NEVER output a series of overly short bullet points.

Your goal is readable, flowing text that guides the reader naturally through ideas rather than fragmenting information into isolated points.
</avoid_excessive_markdown_and_bullet_points>
```

### Research and information gathering

Claude 4.5 models demonstrate exceptional agentic search capabilities and can find and synthesize information from multiple sources effectively. For optimal research results:

1. **Provide clear success criteria**: Define what constitutes a successful answer to your research question

2. **Encourage source verification**: Ask Claude to verify information across multiple sources

3. **For complex research tasks, use a structured approach**:

```text Sample prompt for complex research
Search for this information in a structured way. As you gather data, develop several competing hypotheses. Track your confidence levels in your progress notes to improve calibration. Regularly self-critique your approach and plan. Update a hypothesis tree or research notes file to persist information and provide transparency. Break down this complex research task systematically.
```

This structured approach allows Claude to find and synthesize virtually any piece of information and iteratively critique its findings, no matter the size of the corpus.

### Subagent orchestration

Claude 4.5 models demonstrate significantly improved native subagent orchestration capabilities. These models can recognize when tasks would benefit from delegating work to specialized subagents and do so proactively without requiring explicit instruction.

To take advantage of this behavior:

1. **Ensure well-defined subagent tools**: Have subagent tools available and described in tool definitions
2. **Let Claude orchestrate naturally**: Claude will delegate appropriately without explicit instruction
3. **Adjust conservativeness if needed**:

```text Sample prompt for conservative subagent usage
Only delegate to subagents when the task clearly benefits from a separate agent with a new context window.
```

### Model self-knowledge

If you would like Claude to identify itself correctly in your application or use specific API strings:

```text Sample prompt for model identity
The assistant is Claude, created by Anthropic. The current model is Claude Sonnet 4.5.
```

For LLM-powered apps that need to specify model strings:

```text Sample prompt for model string
When an LLM is needed, please default to Claude Sonnet 4.5 unless the user requests otherwise. The exact model string for Claude Sonnet 4.5 is claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929.
```

### Thinking sensitivity

When extended thinking is disabled, Claude Opus 4.5 is particularly sensitive to the word "think" and its variants. We recommend replacing "think" with alternative words that convey similar meaning, such as "consider," "believe," and "evaluate."

### Leverage thinking & interleaved thinking capabilities

Claude 4.x models offer thinking capabilities that can be especially helpful for tasks involving reflection after tool use or complex multi-step reasoning. You can guide its initial or interleaved thinking for better results.

```text Example prompt
After receiving tool results, carefully reflect on their quality and determine optimal next steps before proceeding. Use your thinking to plan and iterate based on this new information, and then take the best next action.
```

<Info>
  For more information on thinking capabilities, see [Extended thinking](/docs/en/build-with-claude/extended-thinking).
</Info>

### Document creation

Claude 4.5 models excel at creating presentations, animations, and visual documents. These models match or exceed Claude Opus 4.1 in this domain, with impressive creative flair and stronger instruction following. The models produce polished, usable output on the first try in most cases.

For best results with document creation:

```text Sample prompt
Create a professional presentation on [topic]. Include thoughtful design elements, visual hierarchy, and engaging animations where appropriate.
```

### Improved vision capabilities

Claude Opus 4.5 has improved vision capabilities compared to previous Claude models. It performs better on image processing and data extraction tasks, particularly when there are multiple images present in context. These improvements carry over to computer use, where the model can more reliably interpret screenshots and UI elements. You can also use Claude Opus 4.5 to analyze videos by breaking them up into frames.

One technique we've found effective to further boost performance is to give Claude Opus 4.5 a crop tool or [skill](/docs/en/agents-and-tools/agent-skills/overview). We've seen consistent uplift on image evaluations when Claude is able to "zoom" in on relevant regions of an image. We've put together a cookbook for the crop tool [here](https://platform.claude.com/cookbook/multimodal-crop-tool).

### Optimize parallel tool calling

Claude 4.x models excel at parallel tool execution, with Sonnet 4.5 being particularly aggressive in firing off multiple operations simultaneously. Claude 4.x models will:

- Run multiple speculative searches during research
- Read several files at once to build context faster
- Execute bash commands in parallel (which can even bottleneck system performance)

This behavior is easily steerable. While the model has a high success rate in parallel tool calling without prompting, you can boost this to ~100% or adjust the aggression level:

```text Sample prompt for maximum parallel efficiency
<use_parallel_tool_calls>
If you intend to call multiple tools and there are no dependencies between the tool calls, make all of the independent tool calls in parallel. Prioritize calling tools simultaneously whenever the actions can be done in parallel rather than sequentially. For example, when reading 3 files, run 3 tool calls in parallel to read all 3 files into context at the same time. Maximize use of parallel tool calls where possible to increase speed and efficiency. However, if some tool calls depend on previous calls to inform dependent values like the parameters, do NOT call these tools in parallel and instead call them sequentially. Never use placeholders or guess missing parameters in tool calls.
</use_parallel_tool_calls>
```

```text Sample prompt to reduce parallel execution
Execute operations sequentially with brief pauses between each step to ensure stability.
```

### Reduce file creation in agentic coding

Claude 4.x models may sometimes create new files for testing and iteration purposes, particularly when working with code. This approach allows Claude to use files, especially python scripts, as a 'temporary scratchpad' before saving its final output. Using temporary files can improve outcomes particularly for agentic coding use cases.

If you'd prefer to minimize net new file creation, you can instruct Claude to clean up after itself:

```text Sample prompt
If you create any temporary new files, scripts, or helper files for iteration, clean up these files by removing them at the end of the task.
```

### Overeagerness and file creation

Claude Opus 4.5 has a tendency to overengineer by creating extra files, adding unnecessary abstractions, or building in flexibility that wasn't requested. If you're seeing this undesired behavior, add explicit prompting to keep solutions minimal.

For example:

```text Sample prompt to minimize overengineering
Avoid over-engineering. Only make changes that are directly requested or clearly necessary. Keep solutions simple and focused.

Don't add features, refactor code, or make "improvements" beyond what was asked. A bug fix doesn't need surrounding code cleaned up. A simple feature doesn't need extra configurability.

Don't add error handling, fallbacks, or validation for scenarios that can't happen. Trust internal code and framework guarantees. Only validate at system boundaries (user input, external APIs). Don't use backwards-compatibility shims when you can just change the code.

Don't create helpers, utilities, or abstractions for one-time operations. Don't design for hypothetical future requirements. The right amount of complexity is the minimum needed for the current task. Reuse existing abstractions where possible and follow the DRY principle.
```

### Frontend design

Claude 4.x models, particularly Opus 4.5, excel at building complex, real-world web applications with strong frontend design. However, without guidance, models can default to generic patterns that create what users call the "AI slop" aesthetic. To create distinctive, creative frontends that surprise and delight:

<Tip>
For a detailed guide on improving frontend design, see our blog post on [improving frontend design through skills](https://www.claude.com/blog/improving-frontend-design-through-skills).
</Tip>

Here's a system prompt snippet you can use to encourage better frontend design:

```text Sample prompt for frontend aesthetics
<frontend_aesthetics>
You tend to converge toward generic, "on distribution" outputs. In frontend design, this creates what users call the "AI slop" aesthetic. Avoid this: make creative, distinctive frontends that surprise and delight.

Focus on:
- Typography: Choose fonts that are beautiful, unique, and interesting. Avoid generic fonts like Arial and Inter; opt instead for distinctive choices that elevate the frontend's aesthetics.
- Color & Theme: Commit to a cohesive aesthetic. Use CSS variables for consistency. Dominant colors with sharp accents outperform timid, evenly-distributed palettes. Draw from IDE themes and cultural aesthetics for inspiration.
- Motion: Use animations for effects and micro-interactions. Prioritize CSS-only solutions for HTML. Use Motion library for React when available. Focus on high-impact moments: one well-orchestrated page load with staggered reveals (animation-delay) creates more delight than scattered micro-interactions.
- Backgrounds: Create atmosphere and depth rather than defaulting to solid colors. Layer CSS gradients, use geometric patterns, or add contextual effects that match the overall aesthetic.

Avoid generic AI-generated aesthetics:
- Overused font families (Inter, Roboto, Arial, system fonts)
- Clichéd color schemes (particularly purple gradients on white backgrounds)
- Predictable layouts and component patterns
- Cookie-cutter design that lacks context-specific character

Interpret creatively and make unexpected choices that feel genuinely designed for the context. Vary between light and dark themes, different fonts, different aesthetics. You still tend to converge on common choices (Space Grotesk, for example) across generations. Avoid this: it is critical that you think outside the box!
</frontend_aesthetics>
```

You can also refer to the full skill [here](https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/blob/main/plugins/frontend-design/skills/frontend-design/SKILL.md).

### Avoid focusing on passing tests and hard-coding

Claude 4.x models can sometimes focus too heavily on making tests pass at the expense of more general solutions, or may use workarounds like helper scripts for complex refactoring instead of using standard tools directly. To prevent this behavior and ensure robust, generalizable solutions:

```text Sample prompt
Please write a high-quality, general-purpose solution using the standard tools available. Do not create helper scripts or workarounds to accomplish the task more efficiently. Implement a solution that works correctly for all valid inputs, not just the test cases. Do not hard-code values or create solutions that only work for specific test inputs. Instead, implement the actual logic that solves the problem generally.

Focus on understanding the problem requirements and implementing the correct algorithm. Tests are there to verify correctness, not to define the solution. Provide a principled implementation that follows best practices and software design principles.

If the task is unreasonable or infeasible, or if any of the tests are incorrect, please inform me rather than working around them. The solution should be robust, maintainable, and extendable.
```

### Encouraging code exploration

Claude Opus 4.5 is highly capable but can be overly conservative when exploring code. If you notice the model proposing solutions without looking at the code or making assumptions about code it hasn't read, the best solution is to add explicit instructions to the prompt. Claude Opus 4.5 is our most steerable model to date and responds reliably to direct guidance.

For example:

```text Sample prompt for code exploration
ALWAYS read and understand relevant files before proposing code edits. Do not speculate about code you have not inspected. If the user references a specific file/path, you MUST open and inspect it before explaining or proposing fixes. Be rigorous and persistent in searching code for key facts. Thoroughly review the style, conventions, and abstractions of the codebase before implementing new features or abstractions.
```

### Minimizing hallucinations in agentic coding

Claude 4.x models are less prone to hallucinations and give more accurate, grounded, intelligent answers based on the code. To encourage this behavior even more and minimize hallucinations:

```text Sample prompt
<investigate_before_answering>
Never speculate about code you have not opened. If the user references a specific file, you MUST read the file before answering. Make sure to investigate and read relevant files BEFORE answering questions about the codebase. Never make any claims about code before investigating unless you are certain of the correct answer - give grounded and hallucination-free answers.
</investigate_before_answering>
```

## Migration considerations

When migrating to Claude 4.5 models:

1. **Be specific about desired behavior**: Consider describing exactly what you'd like to see in the output.

2. **Frame your instructions with modifiers**: Adding modifiers that encourage Claude to increase the quality and detail of its output can help better shape Claude's performance. For example, instead of "Create an analytics dashboard", use "Create an analytics dashboard. Include as many relevant features and interactions as possible. Go beyond the basics to create a fully-featured implementation."

3. **Request specific features explicitly**: Animations and interactive elements should be requested explicitly when desired.