# PR Verification Testing

**PR #32**: Improve set editing and fix playlist overflow

## Your Mission

This PR claims to implement something. Your job is to:
1. **Verify** the claimed changes actually work
2. **Break** them with edge cases
3. **Ensure** no regressions in related features

## Test This PR

- Can users edit ANY set during active workout?
- Do completed sets stay editable?
- Do long exercise names truncate properly?
```

Claude reads this, understands what changed, and tests specifically for those features.

## What Quinn actually does

Here's a real example from my workout tracker. I opened a PR that said "allow editing any set during a workout."

<Aside type="info" title="See it in action">
  You can view the [actual GitHub Actions run](https://github.com/alexanderop/workoutTracker/actions/runs/20197464088) for this PR. The workflow completed in about 7 minutes and generated a QA report artifact.
</Aside>

Quinn went to work:

```mermaid
graph TD
    A[Start Workout] --> B[Add Exercise]
    B --> C[Fill Set Data]
    C --> D[Mark Complete]
    D --> E{Test Edit Feature}
    E -->|Happy Path| F[Change Weight ✓]
    E -->|Edge Case| G[Enter -50]
    E -->|Edge Case| H[Enter 999999]
    F --> I[Mobile Test]
    G --> I
    H --> I
    I --> J[Long Name Test]
    J --> K[Generate Report]
```

## The report

Quinn generates a full QA report in Markdown:

```markdown